<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Code, the Canonical, the Communist, the Commonplace:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mith.umd.edu/eng738T/the-code-the-canonical-the-communist-the-commonplace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mith.umd.edu/eng738T/the-code-the-canonical-the-communist-the-commonplace/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-code-the-canonical-the-communist-the-commonplace</link>
	<description>English 738T, Spring 2012</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Kason</title>
		<link>http://mith.umd.edu/eng738T/the-code-the-canonical-the-communist-the-commonplace/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Kason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mith.umd.edu/eng738T/?p=926#comment-487</guid>
		<description>This is really interesting. I definitely see how the encoding project may address and problematize the conflicting notions of the &quot;death of the author&quot; approach vs considering history and outside sources. It seems like your Oppen example served in part as an exploration of this issue, and one that necessarily ends up in the second camp. It&#039;s interesting to think about what your &quot;code-mining approach&quot; means in terms of privileging outside sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really interesting. I definitely see how the encoding project may address and problematize the conflicting notions of the &#8220;death of the author&#8221; approach vs considering history and outside sources. It seems like your Oppen example served in part as an exploration of this issue, and one that necessarily ends up in the second camp. It&#8217;s interesting to think about what your &#8220;code-mining approach&#8221; means in terms of privileging outside sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
